![]() If you are taking a calculus course with any other book, try to get a cheap used copy of the Stewart to use as a supplement. All the material is there, it's just presented with an awareness that the reader is trying to learn calculus for the first time. Stewart does not sugar-coat or resort to gimmicks or superficiality in order to make the material learnable. But students will appreciate the effort Stewart has exerted to help them learn. Professors are not generally impressed with a book which spends a half page clearly describing the meaning of a theorem which can be written with a one-line equation. Remember, most textbooks are not written for students: they are written for the professors who are going to choose the books. On every topic, Stewart is clearly conscious of the fact that his reader doesn't already know the subject, and he has given some thought to exactly what has to be explained in order for the student to learn successfully. But of those (many) books which cover the traditional topics in an introductory calculus course, no other author has written a text as learnable as Stewart's. ![]() ![]() There may be other books which take a radically entertaining, non-traditional, and more superficial approach to the subject, and those books may meet with approval from people who really don't want to learn calculus. Please note that the majority of negative reviews came from people who have seen exactly one calculus book, and they clearly don't like calculus! But I have taught from three of the most popular books, and I've read most of the others. But the Stewart book was then, and remains now, IMHO, the best introductory calculus text available. I have not been shy about telling a publisher that their book stinks if that's my opinion. I was one of the pre-publication reviewers for the second edition of this book. Again I say, best college text I've had so far. Perhaps the homework problems weren't always as challenging as other books, but I'd rather understand the problems than sit around staring an unsolvable puzzle for 3 hours. Every chapter was teeming with great example problems, and wasn't saturated with unnecessary proofs (read the Principia or other advanced books if you're interested in that sort of thing). In every case, I ended up shunning the lectures and learning everything straight from Stewart. For Calc I (single variable), the professor spoke in a thick Russian accent in Calc II (advanced integration/series, sequences), the professor was simply inadequate and didn't know how to explain anything in Calc III (multivariable), the professor was a crazy Polish guy bent on teaching us calculus using his own weird linear algebra/advanced math methods (you'd think Berkeley might assign some better math professors.). Contains fully worked-out solutions to all of the odd-numbered exercises in the text, giving students a way to check their answers and ensure that they took the correct steps to arrive at an answer. In my opinion, the best indication of a textbook's worth is having to learn the material solely through the text, instead in addition to a lecturer this book passed that test with flying colors.Of course I had calculus lecturers, but every one of them was horrible. Student Solutions Manual for Stewarts Single Variable Calculus: Early Transcendentals, 8th. Section 7.8 - Improper Integrals - 7.Contrary to what some reviewers have written, I feel that Stewart's Calculus book is easily the best textbook I have encountered so far in college.Section 7.8 - Improper Integrals - 7.8 Exercises James Stewart's CALCULUS: EARLY TRANSCENDENTALS texts are widely renowned for their mathematical precision and accuracy, clarity of exposition, and outstanding examples and problem sets.Section 7.7 - Approximate Integration - 7.7 Exercises.Discovery Project - Patterns in Integrals.Section 7.6 - Discovery Project - Patterns in Integrals.Section 7.6 - Integration Using Tables and Computer Algebra Systems - 7.6 Exercises.Section 7.5 - Strategy for Integration - 7.5 Exercises.Section 7.4 - Integration of Rational Functions by Partial Fractions.Section 7.3 - Trigonometric Substitution - 7.3 Exercises.Section 7.2 - Trigonometric Integrals - 7.2 Exercises.Section 7.1 - Integration by Parts - 7.1 Exercises.Next Answer Chapter 7 - Section 7.1 - Integration by Parts - 7.1 Exercises - : 7 Previous Answer Chapter 7 - Section 7.1 - Integration by Parts - 7.1 Exercises - : 5 Will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback. You can help us out by revising, improving and updatingĪfter you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. We would choose $u=x-1$ and $dv=\sin\pi xdx$įor $dv=\sin\pi xdx$, we analyze as follows $$\int\sin\pi x dx=\int\frac+C$$ Update this answer!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |